On
 Tuesday, the Ad-hoc Working Group on Paris Agreement (APA) asked 
parties to discuss three issues related to global stocktake—inputs 
needed for conducting the stocktake, the process and its relation with 
the dialogue to be conducted in 2018. Global stocktake implies reviewing
 the impact of countries' collective progress on climate actions towards
 the long-term goal of restricting global temperature rise under 2 
degrees Celsius, in accordance with the Paris Agreement. The global 
stocktake involves mitigation, adaptation, finance, technology transfer 
and capacity building. The first global stocktake will take place in 
2023.
During
 the discussion, all parties agreed that global stocktake was crucial 
and must be conducted in accordance with the provisions specified in the
 Paris Agreement. There was a general understanding among parties that 
the global stocktake process must have a technical and political 
component. On the issue of inputs needed for conducting the stocktake, 
parties stated that the inputs could be drawn from sources such as 
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports, synthesis 
reports, biennial reports, national communications, adaptation 
communications, Standing Committee on Finance (SCF) report on finance 
and finance gap report.
There
 was, however, little clarity on how the stocktake should be conducted. 
Jordan, speaking on behalf of the Like Minded Developing Countries 
(LMDC), said that the design of the stocktake process could be taken 
from the submissions of the countries. India and China also held similar
 views. Some parties including the EU, South Africa, Argentina, Columbia
 said that the review process of 2013-15 should also be considered while
 deciding the process of the global stocktake. Jordan also suggested 
that the process of stocktake must be held before COP 23 in Marrakesh. 
Jordan, the EU, Grenada and New Zealand said that the transparency 
framework, which would be established in 2018, should have a significant
 bearing on the global stocktake.
While
 talking of the linkages between the facilitative dialogue of 2018 and 
the global stocktake of 2023, parties held that the scope of the 
facilitative dialogue is limited and meant to assess collective progress
 on mitigation, while global stocktake is comprehensive. But the 
modalities of the facilitative dialogue could help in the global 
stocktake process, they said. India emphasised that the facilitative 
dialogue should also include principles of Equity and Common But 
Differentiated Responsiblity (CBDR) and should get integrated into the 
overall design framework of the 2023 stocktake, without compromising on 
the basic principles of the Convention.
A second stocktaking is scheduled to be held Wednesday evening to assess the progress at the current Bonn session.
No comments :
Post a Comment