On
Tuesday, the Ad-hoc Working Group on Paris Agreement (APA) asked
parties to discuss three issues related to global stocktake—inputs
needed for conducting the stocktake, the process and its relation with
the dialogue to be conducted in 2018. Global stocktake implies reviewing
the impact of countries' collective progress on climate actions towards
the long-term goal of restricting global temperature rise under 2
degrees Celsius, in accordance with the Paris Agreement. The global
stocktake involves mitigation, adaptation, finance, technology transfer
and capacity building. The first global stocktake will take place in
2023.
During
the discussion, all parties agreed that global stocktake was crucial
and must be conducted in accordance with the provisions specified in the
Paris Agreement. There was a general understanding among parties that
the global stocktake process must have a technical and political
component. On the issue of inputs needed for conducting the stocktake,
parties stated that the inputs could be drawn from sources such as
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports, synthesis
reports, biennial reports, national communications, adaptation
communications, Standing Committee on Finance (SCF) report on finance
and finance gap report.
There
was, however, little clarity on how the stocktake should be conducted.
Jordan, speaking on behalf of the Like Minded Developing Countries
(LMDC), said that the design of the stocktake process could be taken
from the submissions of the countries. India and China also held similar
views. Some parties including the EU, South Africa, Argentina, Columbia
said that the review process of 2013-15 should also be considered while
deciding the process of the global stocktake. Jordan also suggested
that the process of stocktake must be held before COP 23 in Marrakesh.
Jordan, the EU, Grenada and New Zealand said that the transparency
framework, which would be established in 2018, should have a significant
bearing on the global stocktake.
While
talking of the linkages between the facilitative dialogue of 2018 and
the global stocktake of 2023, parties held that the scope of the
facilitative dialogue is limited and meant to assess collective progress
on mitigation, while global stocktake is comprehensive. But the
modalities of the facilitative dialogue could help in the global
stocktake process, they said. India emphasised that the facilitative
dialogue should also include principles of Equity and Common But
Differentiated Responsiblity (CBDR) and should get integrated into the
overall design framework of the 2023 stocktake, without compromising on
the basic principles of the Convention.
A second stocktaking is scheduled to be held Wednesday evening to assess the progress at the current Bonn session.
No comments :
Post a Comment